SV Pool Mines Its First Block as November’s Bitcoin Cash Fork Approaches

SV Pool Mines Its First Block as November’s Bitcoin Cash Fork Approaches
ôîòî ïîêàçàíî ñ : news.bitcoin.com

2018-10-12 04:30

On Wednesday, Oct. 10, the mining operation SV Pool mined its first Bitcoin Cash block. The pool operators led by the blockchain firms Nchain and Coingeek say that hundreds of miners from all around the world have signed up to mine with the pool.     

Also Read: Zigzag Platform Provides Bitcoin Cash Swaps Over the Lightning Network

Bitcoin SV Pool Makes a Move On the Scaling Chess Board

There’s a little more than a month left until the Bitcoin Cash (BCH) network upgrade scheduled for November 15. To this day there is still a disagreement between the Bitcoin ABC developers and the team behind Bitcoin SV, the new full node software created by Nchain that has an entirely different upgrade plan. At approximately 10:12 a.m. EDT on Oct. 10, the mining operation SV Pool mined its first BCH block at height 55185. Coingeek and Nchain claim that hundreds of miners are registering for the pool and 233 miners have pre-registered in September. Public registration for the pool will begin in mid-October and the operation plans to add pay-per-share plus (PPS+) payouts alongside the pool’s current pay-per-last-N-shares (PPLNS) plans.

Over the last few weeks, the BCH community has been talking about ‘hash wars’ and solving things with Nakamoto consensus. Lots of people believe that a ‘hash war’ will be sparked between miners who support Bitcoin ABC with miners who support the SV client. Others think there really isn’t much of a divergence within the community and there likely won’t be a split. On Oct. 9 the Coingeek columnist Erik Gibbs claimed Bitcoin ABC developers don’t believe in Nakamoto consensus. Gibbs also wrote that the recent debate has led to some people saying the November hard fork could result in a split.   

“But there is a minority of individuals who are apparently pushing for it to happen,” the Coingeek writer explained. “One of these is Bitcoin ABC — The development team has repeatedly spoken out against several advances that are being added to Bitcoin BCH, including the Nakamoto Consensus.”

The Question Remains: Increase the Limit Now or Optimize Before Raising the Limit?

The Bitcoin ABC development team and volunteers appeared in a video on Oct. 4, answering all kinds of questions concerning some of the roadmap’s upgrades. During one of the questions, the ABC developers were asked why Bitcoin SV programmers disliked canonical transaction ordering (CTOR). The Bitcoin Cash miner and programmer Jonathan Toomim answered the question by claiming that the Bitcoin SV camp is wrong about CTOR.

“Bitcoin SV believes that CTOR is wrong and that we shouldn’t do it — They are wrong about that because CTOR is great and awesome and it will help Bitcoin scale,” Toomim details. “Bitcoin SV has this very interesting idea but interesting in not so good of a way. They want to increase the block size limit while simultaneously getting rid of the features that will help us achieve the block size limit or a higher capacity in a safe fashion.”

Q&A with Bitcoin ABC developers and other contributors. Hash Wars and Two Hard Fork Rule Sets Colliding

Toomim also adds that he doesn’t have any sympathy for the Bitcoin SV perspective at all. The developer says that CTOR helps improve block propagation and with the Graphene protocol added it could create a huge difference in optimization performance. Further, Bitcoin ABC developer Jason Cox detailed how the failure rate for compact blocks gets more excessive when huge blocks are processed. At the very end of the video, Toomin emphasizes that a ‘hash war’ is the wrong way to find a resolution to this disagreement.

“You can’t use a hash war to resolve this issue — If you have different hard forking rule sets you are going to have a persistent chain split no matter what the hash rate distribution is,” Toomin adds.  

Overall the biggest disagreement between both camps is the method by which BCH can achieve scaling massive sized blocks. The Bitcoin SV team wants to upgrade the block size limit to 128 MB this November and continue increasing the limit over time. Bitcoin ABC believes the chain won’t be capable of handling these large block sizes without adding things like CTOR beforehand. The disagreement has led to certain members of the community choosing sides, while some remain neutral and wait to see if a ‘hash war’ will really come to fruition.

Feel like you missed something? For a brief history concerning BCH consensus changes planned for Nov. 15, 2018, check out these reports below:

The Opposition Towards Bitcoin ABC’s Proposed Upgrade Changes Coingeek Speaks on Consensus Changes and Next-Gen ASIC Chip Nchain Plans to Launch a BCH Full Node Client Called ‘Bitcoin SV’ November BCH Upgrade Discussion Heats Up After Bitcoin SV Full Node Announcement Network Incompatibility Discussed After Bitcoin ABC Launches Latest Version Nchain Publishes Bitcoin SV Alpha Release Wormhole Developers Address Rumors Concerning Protocol Security Two Exchanges Publish Contingency Plans for November BCH Fork Bitcoin Cash Stress Test Goes Beyond 24-Hours Setting New Records Bitcoin Cash Hard Fork Debate Reconvenes After the Stress Test

What do you think about the upcoming Nov. 15 hard fork? Do you think a ‘hash war’ will take place? Let us know what you think about this subject in the comment section below.

Images via Shutterstock, Youtube, and SV-Pool.

Want to create your own secure cold storage paper wallet? Check our tools section.

The post SV Pool Mines Its First Block as November’s Bitcoin Cash Fork Approaches appeared first on Bitcoin News.

Similar to Notcoin - TapSwap on Solana Airdrops In 2024

origin »

Bitcoin (BTC) íà Currencies.ru

$ 66267.72 (-0.20%)
Îáúåì 24H $19.149b
Èçìåíåèÿ 24h: -1.08 %, 7d: 7.97 %
Cåãîäíÿ L: $66031.14 - H: $66391.13
Êàïèòàëèçàöèÿ $1305.515b Rank 1
Öåíà â ÷àñ íîâîñòè $ 6319.93 (948.55%)

bitcoin pool cash block fork approaches november

bitcoin pool → Ðåçóëüòàòîâ: 87


Bitcoin Mining Pool Stirs Controversy by Promoting Censoring BTC Transactions

Blockchain analyst firm, BlockSeer has launched a private mining pool, currently, in beta, that will censor certain Bitcoin transactions. Given that the Bitcoin community emphasizes censorship-resistance, an essential feature of cryptocurrency that makes it differentiating from the central bank digital currencies, it’s pretty obvious that the company would come under fire for its move.

2020-11-14 22:33


BTC.com äîáàâèò ïîääåðæêó Ethereum è Ethereum Classic

Ïðèíàäëåæàùèé Bitmain ìàéíèíãîâûé ïóë BTC. com íàìåðåí â ñêîðîì âðåìåíè äîáàâèòü ïîääåðæêó Ethereum è Ethereum Classic. Îá ýòîì êîìïàíèÿ çàÿâèëà â ïðåññ-ðåëèçå. Ïîëüçîâàòåëè ñìîãóò ïðèñîåäèíèòüñÿ ê ïóëó ïî äîáû÷å äâóõ íîâûõ êðèïòîâàëþò ÷åðåç ïîðòàë pool.

2018-8-30 19:38


To fight the talent shortage, train your current employees

How many people can program a driverless car? How many can program an artificial intelligence? How many can get their head around blockchain (and no, it doesn’t count if you invested ˆ100 in Bitcoin)? And yet, how many times have you read about driverless cars being on the cusp of adoption, or traditional currencies being on the verge of becoming obsolete? The truth is, the pool of individuals who actually know how to build these technologies is very small.

2018-8-26 21:30


PR: ExCraft Launches DAO, User-Governed Cryptocurrency Exchange

Hong Kong, 10 August 2018 – ExCraft, a cloud-native cryptocurrency exchange based in Hong Kong that implements a DAO governance ran by the users and pools, was launched today. ExCraft stands out by being a community and pool focused exchange, rewarding traders through a combination of “Proof of Existence” (PoE) and “Proof of Stake” (PoS) mechanisms, allowing power-users to create pools, vote for new project listings, and even create dedicated pool exchanges based on its immutable and fair PoE and PoS meritocracy.

2018-8-10 12:30


In today’s edition of Bitcoin in Brief we cover a number of stories related to crime from around the cryptosphere: an exchange operator pleads guilty to securities fraud, a scammer is fined over $1.9 million for bitcoin and binary options fraud,

Manhattan U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman said: “Montroll deceived his investors and then attempted to deceive the SEC. He also failed to register with the CFTC as a Commodity Pool Operator. He promised to convert this into fiat and invest it on customers’ behalf in a pooled investment, including trading binary options on an online

2018-7-25 18:25


Notes on Blockchain Governance

In which I argue that “tightly coupled” on-chain voting is overrated, the status quo of “informal governance” as practiced by Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Ethereum, Zcash and similar systems is much less bad than commonly thought, that people who think that the purpose of blockchains is to completely expunge soft mushy human intuitions and feelings in favor of completely algorithmic governance (emphasis on “completely”) are absolutely crazy, and loosely coupled voting as done by Carbonvotes and similar systems is underrated, as well as describe what framework should be used when thinking about blockchain governance in the first place.

2018-7-21 23:03


Ôîòî:

‘Miners Are Miners Again’: Bitcoin Core Dev Launches Alternative Mining Protocol

Bitcoin core developer Matt Corallo has launched a mining pool which aims to increase decentralization as Bitcoin mining becomes increasingly monopolized. Corallo: Miners ‘Have No Control’ Beginning June 25 but still with what Corallo describes as “vulnerabilities,” the pool uses BetterHash, a protocol which seeks to offer mining pool users the option to use their own block templates rather than those prescribed by pool owners.

2018-7-3 20:00