Illegal Bitcoin Pool Operator Ordered to Pay Almost $2 Million in a Case Filed by CFTC

Illegal Bitcoin Pool Operator Ordered to Pay Almost $2 Million in a Case Filed by CFTC
фото показано с : blokt.com

2018-7-26 20:23

In a press release, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced that it has successfully prosecuted another fraudulent cryptocurrency case against Dillon Michael Dean and his UK-registered company, The Entrepreneurs Headquarters Limited (TEH), for operating an illegal Bitcoin investment pool. As a result, the US District Court for the Eastern District of New York ordered the accused to pay over $1.9 million in restitution and civil monetary penalties.

Bitcoin Fraud Case Brought to Light

In an Order and Default Judgment, Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein of the New York federal court held that Dean and the company TEH had been engaged in a fraudulent Bitcoin scheme. The court found that defendants sought Bitcoins from people and misrepresented that funds of customers will be pooled and put in investments, such as in binary options. The court also found that the funds of pool participants were misappropriated and that TEH did not register with the CFTC as a Commodity Pool Operator (CPO), nor did Dean seek Associated Person of a CPO registration.

The Order further unearthed that the defendants solicited Bitcoins worth at least $499,264.04 from 127 people between April 2017 and January 18, 2018 (date of filing of the CFTC complaint). During this period, the defendants were not registered with the agency in any capacity. The defendants, during this time, promised the investors that they would convert their Bitcoins to fiat and invest on their behalf in a pooled vehicle that trades in commodities. They also promised a binary options trade on an online exchange that is designated as a contracts market by the federal watchdog.

Customers Were Fooled With the Promise of High Returns

Promises of high return and trading expertise were used by the defendants to fool the investors. They also used social media channels like YouTube, Facebook, etc. to seek investments. These promotions claimed that Dean has “strong skills” in binary options and that they were already generating high returns on the investments. All these profits were, however, fictitious. Consequently, defendants were ordered to pay customer victims restitution in an amount totaling $432,184.79, as well as civil penalties amounting to $1,497,792.12. Apart from this, defendants have been banned from trading and registration permanently.

However, the CFTC warns the customer victims that despite the order for repayment, they may not be able to recover any amount due from defendants as defendants may not have enough assets to liquidate.

Illegal Bitcoin Pool Operator Ordered to Pay Almost $2 Million in a Case Filed by CFTC was originally found on [blokt] - Blockchain, Bitcoin & Cryptocurrency News.

Similar to Notcoin - TapSwap on Solana Airdrops In 2024

origin »

Bitcoin (BTC) на Currencies.ru

$ 65983.71 (+0.05%)
Объем 24H $41.847b
Изменеия 24h: 6.56 %, 7d: 7.02 %
Cегодня L: $65855.37 - H: $66316.72
Капитализация $1299.805b Rank 1
Цена в час новости $ 8276.22 (697.27%)

bitcoin case illegal cftc pool ordered pay

bitcoin case → Результатов: 126


Bitcoin’s (BTC) price clocked a two-month high of $7,820 today and looks set to extend gains further, a key cryptomarket gauge indicates. CoinMarketCap’s bitcoin dominance rate, an indicator that tracks the percent of the total cryptocurrency market

To start with, a rise in the BTC dominance rate essentially means the number one cryptocurrency is more in demand compared to the alternative cryptocurrencies. The above chart shows: The BTC dominance rate has increased from 40.

2018-7-23 18:29


Фото:

Governance, Part 2: Plutocracy Is Still Bad

Coin holder voting, both for governance of technical features, and for more extensive use cases like deciding who runs validator nodes and who receives money from development bounty funds, is unfortunately continuing to be popular, and so it seems worthwhile for me to write another post explaining why I (and Vlad Zamfir and others) do not consider it wise for Ethereum (or really, any base-layer blockchain) to start adopting these kinds of mechanisms in a tightly coupled form in any significant way.

2018-7-21 23:03


Notes on Blockchain Governance

In which I argue that “tightly coupled” on-chain voting is overrated, the status quo of “informal governance” as practiced by Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Ethereum, Zcash and similar systems is much less bad than commonly thought, that people who think that the purpose of blockchains is to completely expunge soft mushy human intuitions and feelings in favor of completely algorithmic governance (emphasis on “completely”) are absolutely crazy, and loosely coupled voting as done by Carbonvotes and similar systems is underrated, as well as describe what framework should be used when thinking about blockchain governance in the first place.

2018-7-21 23:03


What Is BTCPay?

Bitcoin payment processors come in many different shapes and sizes. In every single case, users rely on centralized parties to take care of most of the legwork. BTCPay Server is an interesting solution in this regard, as it provides self-hosted payment processing through the BitPay API. The Concept of BTCPay Competition in the world of […]

2018-7-20 18:00