MIT Professor: Blockchain Is Good on Its Own but Not Good for Voting

MIT Professor: Blockchain Is Good on Its Own but Not Good for Voting
фото показано с : cointelegraph.com

2020-2-29 21:23

Computer scientist Ronald Rivest has said that blockchain is not the right technology for voting, although it can find proper application in a number of other areas.

Similar to Notcoin - TapSwap on Solana Airdrops In 2024

origin »

High Performance Blockchain (HPB) на Currencies.ru

$ 0.0100291 (+7.61%)
Объем 24H $25.057k
Изменеия 24h: 5.20 %, 7d: 30.40 %
Cегодня L: $0.0090557 - H: $0.0100291
Капитализация $732.823k Rank 1812
Цена в час новости $ 0.1896 (-94.71%)

voting good blockchain find technology although proper

voting good → Результатов: 17


On Collusion

Special thanks to Glen Weyl, Phil Daian and Jinglan Wang for review Over the last few years there has been an increasing interest in using deliberately engineered economic incentives and mechanism design to align behavior of participants in various contexts.

2019-4-5 04:03


Фото:

The blockchain can’t change the world, but it’s a good start

It’s hard to find a tech news site that doesn’t have at least one article in the headlines about how blockchain is going to change the world. The decentralized technology behind Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies has been credited with the potential not only to disrupt our modern banking system, but to completely revolutionize industries like healthcare, investing, messaging, and even voting.

2018-10-2 21:13


Фото:

Governance, Part 2: Plutocracy Is Still Bad

Coin holder voting, both for governance of technical features, and for more extensive use cases like deciding who runs validator nodes and who receives money from development bounty funds, is unfortunately continuing to be popular, and so it seems worthwhile for me to write another post explaining why I (and Vlad Zamfir and others) do not consider it wise for Ethereum (or really, any base-layer blockchain) to start adopting these kinds of mechanisms in a tightly coupled form in any significant way.

2018-7-21 23:03


Notes on Blockchain Governance

In which I argue that “tightly coupled” on-chain voting is overrated, the status quo of “informal governance” as practiced by Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Ethereum, Zcash and similar systems is much less bad than commonly thought, that people who think that the purpose of blockchains is to completely expunge soft mushy human intuitions and feelings in favor of completely algorithmic governance (emphasis on “completely”) are absolutely crazy, and loosely coupled voting as done by Carbonvotes and similar systems is underrated, as well as describe what framework should be used when thinking about blockchain governance in the first place.

2018-7-21 23:03


Good to “GO” votes are in, EOS mainnet updates goes live

On June 9th, the launch of the EOS blockchain has validated their goals towards reaching more than $4 billion to help develop their open-source software over a year-long ICO. Candidates in the role of validators and “block producers” from all across the world have successfully established their power by voting “GO” to the mainnet live. […]

2018-6-11 13:23

Фото:

On Radical Markets

Recently I had the fortune to have received an advance copy of Eric Posner and Glen Weyl’s new book, Radical Markets, which could be best described as an interesting new way of looking at the subject that is sometimes called “political economy” - tackling the big questions of how markets and politics and society intersect.

2018-7-21 04:03