SBF granted post-trial extension indicating potential appeal strategy or reduced sentencing

SBF granted post-trial extension indicating potential appeal strategy or reduced sentencing
фото показано с : cryptoslate.com

2023-11-20 15:30

Judge Lewis A. Kaplan of the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, has granted a request for an extension for filing post-trial motions in the case against Sam Bankman-Fried, according to a court order dated Nov. 18.

The granted extension, as requested by Bankman-Fried’s legal representation from Cohen & Gresser LLP, sets new deadlines for the subsequent phases of the legal battle. According to the endorsed memo, the defense’s post-trial motions, initially due on Nov. 20, are now rescheduled for Dec. 1. The adjustment also shifts the government’s response deadline to Dec. 22, followed by the defense’s reply due on Jan. 8, 2024. This alteration in the timeline provides both parties additional time to prepare their arguments, reflecting the complexity and gravity of the case.

Sam Bankman-Fried, the founder of the now-defunct cryptocurrency exchange FTX, faces severe legal repercussions following a jury’s guilty verdict on all seven charges, including wire fraud, securities fraud, and money laundering. The charges stemming from his role in defrauding approximately $8 billion of FTX customers have placed him at the center of one of the most significant financial fraud investigations in the digital currency space.

The extension for filing post-trial motions is a critical juncture in the legal process, allowing Bankman-Fried’s defense team to prepare the subsequent stages of their case. The government’s consent to this new schedule indicates a mutual understanding of the need for thorough preparation ahead of the complex legal arguments expected to ensue.

Significance of Post-trial motions.

One key aspect of post-trial motions is the potential request for a new trial. This is typically grounded in claims of significant errors that may have influenced the trial’s outcome. For instance, the emergence of new evidence or allegations of juror misconduct can form the basis of an argument that the original trial was compromised, potentially warranting a retrial. Such motions underscore the ongoing dynamics of legal strategies even after a verdict has been delivered.

Additionally, the defense can file a motion for judgment of acquittal post-verdict. This motion challenges the sufficiency of the prosecution’s evidence, asserting that it was inadequate to support a guilty verdict. In such cases, if the judge concurs with this assessment, they possess the authority to overrule the jury’s decision, thereby altering the course of the case’s outcome.

Sentencing considerations also play a pivotal role in post-trial motions. Despite a guilty verdict, the specifics of sentencing can vary significantly. The defense might advocate for a reduced sentence, drawing upon factors like the defendant’s history, the nature of the offense, and other mitigating elements. These arguments are crucial in shaping the final penal consequences for the convicted individual.

Post-trial motions are also instrumental in paving the way for appeals. By highlighting and documenting contestable issues at this stage, the defense builds a foundation for potential appellate review. It is crucial to note that appellate courts generally limit their examination to matters raised in earlier court proceedings, making this process a strategic element of long-term legal planning. Furthermore, these motions allow the defense to reevaluate and refine their legal approach based on the trial’s progression. This reflective process involves identifying effective tactics, acknowledging shortcomings, and strategizing for upcoming phases, mainly if an appeal is under consideration. This aspect of post-trial motions is a testament to the evolving nature of legal strategies in complex cases.

As the legal proceedings continue, the broader implications of this case remain a point of keen interest for observers in the financial and legal communities. The outcome of this case is expected to have far-reaching consequences for the cryptocurrency industry and regulatory frameworks surrounding digital assets.

The post-trial motion schedule, now set to unfold over the coming months, is poised to be a pivotal phase in a case that has captured the attention of the global financial community.

The post SBF granted post-trial extension indicating potential appeal strategy or reduced sentencing appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Similar to Notcoin - Blum - Airdrops In 2024

origin »

Aragon Court (ANJ) на Currencies.ru

$ 0.1722 (+0.00%)
Объем 24H $0
Изменеия 24h: 0.00 %, 7d: -1.39 %
Cегодня L: $0.1722 - H: $0.1722
Капитализация $22.15m Rank 99999
Доступно / Всего 128.645m ANJ

district court post-trial granted extension motions filing

district court → Результатов: 126


Фото:

ICO fraud update: DJ Khaled and Mayweather walk free, Kevin Hart next to be investigated

The US Court for the Southern District of Florida has dismissed the case of initial coin offering (ICO) fraud against DJ Khaled and boxer Floyd Mayweather. The court decided that despite Khaled and Mayweather shilled defunct cryptocurrency firm CentraTech (and its associated ICO of CTR tokens) on their social media profiles, they did not play a big enough role in its promotion to warrant further legal action.

2019-5-15 17:05


OneCoin Officially Sued For Scamming ‘Thousands Upon Thousands’ in the US

OneCoin, the alleged Ponzi scheme, may have finally come to an end as a U. S. lawsuit indicting its founders and $4 billion revenues becomes formal. OneCoin: Class Action Demand By $103K Investor A class action document filed May 7 at the US Southern District Court of New York brings multiple charges against four executives behind OneCoin: brother and sister duo Konstantin Ignatov and Ruja Ignatova, Sebastian Greenwood and Mark Scott.

2019-5-9 16:00


Craig Wright backed against the wall; court orders ‘self-proclaimed Satoshi’ to produce BTC ownership documents

It looks like the tables have turned for the self-proclaimed creator of Bitcoin, with Craig S Wright finding himself on the receiving end of a legal notice. On May 3, a US District Court, from the Southern District of Florida issued an order to “Faketoshi” to provide ownership evidence of Bitcoin addresses which are over […] The post Craig Wright backed against the wall; court orders ‘self-proclaimed Satoshi’ to produce BTC ownership documents appeared first on AMBCrypto.

2019-5-5 14:00


Фото:

Self-Styled Satoshi Accused of PGP Forgery in Kleiman vs Wright Lawsuit

The Southern District Court of Florida case, Kleiman v. Wright, continues to be one of the 10 most monitored court dockets in the state. On April 28, the Kleiman estate’s legal team responded to Wright’s most recent motion to dismiss the case by claiming that Wright submitted a forgery as evidence and allege the fraudulent […] The post Self-Styled Satoshi Accused of PGP Forgery in Kleiman vs Wright Lawsuit appeared first on Bitcoin News.

2019-4-30 19:20


Фото:

Mt. Gox readies to pay back creditors five years after hack

Troubled cryptocurrency exchange Mt. Gox is finally inching closer to settling its debt with creditors, some five years after it was hacked. According to new documents published by Mt. Gox‘s trustee Nobuaki Kobayashi (aka Tokyo Whale, as he’s known in cryptocurrency circles), a decision has been made with regards to creditor’s claims – they’ve been approved or disapproved – and the Tokyo District Court has been notified.

2019-3-21 15:32


Фото:

Jeff Garzik Subpoenaed in Kleiman Bitcoin Lawsuit Against Craig Wright

On March 15, well-known Bitcoin developer Jeff Garzik revealed he was subpoenaed by the U.S. District Court of Southern Florida in the infamous Kleiman vs Wright bitcoin lawsuit. The Kleiman family is suing the self-proclaimed Satoshi for roughly 300,000 BTC and Garzik has been served by the court and asked to submit assorted documents and […] The post Jeff Garzik Subpoenaed in Kleiman Bitcoin Lawsuit Against Craig Wright appeared first on Bitcoin News.

2019-3-16 01:57


Фото:

Mt.Gox’s Mark Karpeles Dodges Embezzlement Charges, Lands Jail Term for Falsifying Data

The former owner of the now-defunct Mt. Gox bitcoin exchange, Mark Karpeles, has been sentenced to two and half years in prison by a prosecutors in Japan. The Tokyo District Court found him guilty for falsifying computer data in connection with the colossal heist, an event that saw half a billion dollars worth of bitcoin disappearRead MoreRead More.

2019-3-15 14:17


Фото:

Mt. Gox

Mark Karpeles with user funds kept on Mt. Gox in a bid to obfuscate the losses. He was handed a 33-month suspended sentence, Bloomberg reports. The Tokyo District Court also found the Frenchman ‘not-guilty’ of embezzlement, after it decided he had committed those crimes without ill intent.

2019-3-15 13:36


Фото:

Brazilian Crypto Exchange Wins Legal Battle Over Closed Bank Account

A court in Rio de Janeiro has ruled in favor of Brazilian crypto exchange Mercado Bitcoin in a case over the closure of one of its checking accounts. The judicial instance turned down an appeal filed by Banco Sicoob against a decision by the district court in Barra da Tijuca which granted the exchange the […] The post Brazilian Crypto Exchange Wins Legal Battle Over Closed Bank Account appeared first on Bitcoin News.

2019-2-10 05:40


Bitcoin Qualifies as Money in Case of First Impression in Florida’s Third District Court of Appeal

On Wednesday, Florida’s Third District Court of Appeal ruled that Bitcoin qualifies as money in a case that turned on whether the digital currency is driving financial crime. According to a post by the Daily Business Review; “The appellate court’s opinion reverses Miami-Dade Circuit Court Judge Teresa Pooler’s 2016 finding that digital or cryptocurrency could not […] The post Bitcoin Qualifies as Money in Case of First Impression in Florida’s Third District Court of Appeal appeared first on ZyCrypto.

2019-2-1 16:40