XRP Validators Start Voting on NFT-Related Amendment

2022-8-31 21:19

XRPL validators will have two weeks to vote on a proposal that will enable native non-fungible tokens

Similar to Notcoin - TapSwap on Solana Airdrops In 2024

origin »

Non-Fungible Yearn (NFY) на Currencies.ru

$ 12.91 (-1.09%)
Объем 24H $12.624k
Изменеия 24h: 0.32 %, 7d: -51.25 %
Cегодня L: $12.91 - H: $12.91
Капитализация $0 Rank 2990
Доступно / Всего 0 NFY

validators vote proposal native tokens non-fungible enable

validators vote → Результатов: 14


nOS blockchain app and development portal launches public testnet

nOS, a blockchain platform with built-in DApp store allowing for fair and transparent distribution and discovery of web-apps, announced today the official launch of the nOS public testnet. Users can now test the blockchain’s latest features such as staking testnet NOS, vote for validators, build blockchain code and applications, launch validator nodes and collect block […] CryptoNinjas: nOS blockchain app and development portal launches public testnet

2020-2-7 13:57


New DAO Introduced: StakerDAO Allows Users to Vote the Best Sources of Rewards for Validators

On Wednesday, October 30, 2019, CEO of Tezos Capital, Jonas Lamis introduced the idea behind its recently launched decentralized autonomous organization (DAO), StakerDAO reports Coindesk. What does this new interpretation of DAO entail? According to the claims made, it encourages users to vote for the best sources of rewards that can be earned by validators […]

2019-10-31 19:28


A CBC Casper Tutorial

In order to help more people understand “the other Casper” (Vlad Zamfir’s CBC Casper), and specifically the instantiation that works best for blockchain protocols, I thought that I would write an explainer on it myself, from a less abstract and more “close to concrete usage” point of view.

2018-12-6 04:03


Фото:

Governance, Part 2: Plutocracy Is Still Bad

Coin holder voting, both for governance of technical features, and for more extensive use cases like deciding who runs validator nodes and who receives money from development bounty funds, is unfortunately continuing to be popular, and so it seems worthwhile for me to write another post explaining why I (and Vlad Zamfir and others) do not consider it wise for Ethereum (or really, any base-layer blockchain) to start adopting these kinds of mechanisms in a tightly coupled form in any significant way.

2018-7-21 23:03


Notes on Blockchain Governance

In which I argue that “tightly coupled” on-chain voting is overrated, the status quo of “informal governance” as practiced by Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Ethereum, Zcash and similar systems is much less bad than commonly thought, that people who think that the purpose of blockchains is to completely expunge soft mushy human intuitions and feelings in favor of completely algorithmic governance (emphasis on “completely”) are absolutely crazy, and loosely coupled voting as done by Carbonvotes and similar systems is underrated, as well as describe what framework should be used when thinking about blockchain governance in the first place.

2018-7-21 23:03