Research Attempts to Uncover Political Leanings of Crypto Community

Research Attempts to Uncover Political Leanings of Crypto Community
ôîòî ïîêàçàíî ñ : bitcoinist.com

2018-8-20 01:00

Although Bitcoin is inherently neutral, its influence is becoming increasingly pervasive in U.S. political spheres. This phenomenon is triggering researchers to try to identify the dominant political ideology of the cryptocurrency community. 

What is the Prevalent Political Ideology of the Crypto Community?

Bitcoin’s neutral and democratic nature is one of its primary virtues. As such, Bitcoin does not belong to any political group — nor any other type of group. Nevertheless, some observers, such as Professor Harold James, consider it a threat “not just to the international financial system, but also to political order.”

Others ascribe the majority of cryptocurrency enthusiasts as having a particular political leaning. For example, Professor David Golumbia, in his book “The Politics of Bitcoin: Software as Righ-Wing Extremism,” laments that since its inception:

Bitcoin has been widely promoted as a digital currency that will revolutionize everything from online commerce to the nation-state. Yet supporters of Bitcoin and its blockchain technology subscribe to a form of cyberlibertarianism that depends to a surprising extent on far-right political thought.

Most recently, Peter Ryan stated on The Hill that “While some say crypto is apolitical, others argue a technology that takes direct aim at central bank-driven monetary policy can’t be anything otherwise.”

"there’s a coming conflict between the original crypto radicals and the new blockchain conformists."https://t.co/5TPItUx87v

— Peter Ryan (@_PeterRyan) August 18, 2018

Moreover, Ryan points out, “While liberal came out as the largest single category, if you combine libertarian and anarcho-capitalist, they outnumbered the liberals by 5 percentage points.” Summarizing between right versus left, Ryan concluded that 52 percent of the crypto community is right-wing, while 45 percent is left-wing.

Politicians Are Embracing Bitcoin

A growing number of politicians of various pedigrees are embracing Bitcoin. For example, many candidates want to accept Bitcoin donations. In June 2018, Oregon Secretary of State Dennis Richardson requested that political campaigns in the state of Oregon be given the right to receive donations in Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. In August 2018, the Fair Political Practices Commission of California proposed that cryptocurrency political donations be considered as cash contributions to comply with state legislation.

On the other hand, the states of North Carolina and Kansas have declined petitions to allow cryptocurrency donations.

Accepting donations in cryptocurrencies is not something new. Former U.S. presidential candidate Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) asked for contributions in Bitcoin during his last presidential campaign. For the 2020 presidential election, candidate Andrew Yang already announced he would accept cryptocurrencies to fund his campaign.

Some businesses foresee a boom in crypto donations. For instance, Bitpay already offers tools to facilitate political contributions in bitcoins, while claiming to be compliant with U.S. campaign finance laws.

What do you think of politicians’ growing interest in Bitcoin? Let us know what you think in the comments below. 

Images courtesy of  Pixabay, Twitter.

The post Research Attempts to Uncover Political Leanings of Crypto Community appeared first on Bitcoinist.com.

Similar to Notcoin - TapSwap on Solana Airdrops In 2024

origin »

Waves Community Token (WCT) íà Currencies.ru

$ 0 (+0.00%)
Îáúåì 24H $0
Èçìåíåèÿ 24h: 0.00 %, 7d: 1.05 %
Cåãîäíÿ L: $0 - H: $0
Êàïèòàëèçàöèÿ $0 Rank 99999
Öåíà â ÷àñ íîâîñòè $ 0.3119 (-100%)

political community bitcoin crypto research any group

political community → Ðåçóëüòàòîâ: 9


CoinDesk Research Reveals Bitcoin’s Political Ties More Than Just Libertarians

Ever since bitcoin was first discovered, early adopters were known as being libertarians – those who prefer limited government interference and more freedom. To see if this is still true, CoinDesk Research decided to conduct a survey, with crypto community members being the participants, to see whether libertarians are the only ones to prefer the […]

2018-7-28 19:10


Ôîòî:

Governance, Part 2: Plutocracy Is Still Bad

Coin holder voting, both for governance of technical features, and for more extensive use cases like deciding who runs validator nodes and who receives money from development bounty funds, is unfortunately continuing to be popular, and so it seems worthwhile for me to write another post explaining why I (and Vlad Zamfir and others) do not consider it wise for Ethereum (or really, any base-layer blockchain) to start adopting these kinds of mechanisms in a tightly coupled form in any significant way.

2018-7-21 23:03


Ôîòî:

On Radical Markets

Recently I had the fortune to have received an advance copy of Eric Posner and Glen Weyl’s new book, Radical Markets, which could be best described as an interesting new way of looking at the subject that is sometimes called “political economy” - tackling the big questions of how markets and politics and society intersect.

2018-7-21 04:03