A quiet comparison between two enterprise-focused blockchain networks reveals how value inside distributed systems gets judged. Hedera has long presented itself as a serious infrastructure layer for institutions. Strong governance names, real-world pilots, and steady technical performance helped build that image. Questions now center on whether those strengths translate into lasting value for the HBAR token itself.

Market analyst ElonTrades, on X, frames the debate through a direct contrast between Hedera and Canton. His review accepts that Hedera achieved credible milestones. The network operates alongside global corporations on its council and supports institutional experiments, such as tokenized UK gilts used as foreign-exchange collateral.

Transaction speed near 10,000 TPS and predictable low fees show clear enterprise intent. Evidence of more than $10B in processed real world asset settlements adds weight to the adoption story.

ElonTrades argues that the core weakness sits inside Hedera’s economic structure. Network fees stay priced in USD terms and convert into HBAR only at execution. Enterprises gain stability and cost clarity through that model. Token demand does not scale in the same direction as usage. Lower and predictable fees reduce the amount of HBAR required per transaction. A partial burn mechanism exists, yet current activity leaves that effect minimal.

$HBAR vs $CC

Hedera is interesting but has some fundamental problems when you compare it to Canton.

What’s real: Legitimate enterprise governance council (Google, IBM, Boeing, LG). Real institutional pilots with Lloyds Banking Group, Archax, Shinhan Bank. First US-listed HBAR…

Token supply creates another constraint. Total issuance reached 50 billion units from the start, with treasury distribution continuing on a schedule. Scarcity events that often support long-term token appreciation remain absent.

Canton (CC), in comparative discussion, follows a different path where burn and mint mechanics trend toward deflation over time. Structural contrast between the two systems becomes difficult to ignore when value capture enters the conversation.

Network design also separates the projects. Hedera launched HashSphere in 2025 to introduce hybrid privacy features. ElonTrades interprets that move as recognition that institutions require permissioned flexibility beyond a purely public ledger. Canton began with privacy-centric architecture from day one, which aligns more directly with regulated financial workflows.

Builder presence reinforces the divide. Hedera supports pilots involving Lloyds and Archax. Canton connects to heavyweight financial infrastructure that includes DTCC, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan, BNP Paribas, and Nasdaq, alongside dozens of super validators processing massive daily settlement value. Scale of institutional alignment shapes perception about which network could anchor future capital markets activity.

Read Also: Leaked Ripple Emails Expose the Real Institutional Playbook Behind XRP

ElonTrades concludes that HBAR functions mainly as governance and gas within a system designed to keep costs low. Adoption may grow without proportional token appreciation under that structure. Canton presents a contrasting framework where network economics and institutional design connect more tightly.

Subscribe to our YouTube channel for daily crypto updates, market insights, and expert analysis.

The post Is Canton Superior to Hedera? Analyst Reveals Key Problem HBAR Can’t Fix appeared first on CaptainAltcoin.

Bitcoin price in Telegram @btc_price_every_hour

78 +