Highest Ethereum Transaction Fee Ever? Someone Accidentally Paid a $2.5 Million Fee

2020-6-11 04:05

Someone seems to have mistakenly paid $2.5 million in Ethereum transaction fees to send just $133 in ETH. Though, the real reason could be more nefarious.

A $2.5 Million Ethereum Transaction Fee

Earlier today, just before 10:00 UTC, a transaction was sent on the Ethereum network that cost the sender over $2.5 million. Instead of opting for a fee that could be as low as $0.5, the sender paid 10,668.73 ETH, worth $2.59 million, to send 0.55 ETH, worth $133.85 at press time.

The fee went to Spark Pool, a Chinese mining pool that processed the transaction. The pool paused payouts to its miners and is waiting for the sender to contact them.

The Ethereum transaction on Etherscan

The transaction was included in block 10,237,208 by Spark Pool, an Ethereum mining pool based in China. Spark Pool has since blocked the payout to its miners, telling its followers on Twitter that they are currently investigating the unusually high fee and are trying to identify the owner.

We are further investigating the incident of unusually high tx fee, and you are welcome to provide clues to [email protected]. SparkPool has had the experience of handling similar issues properly. There will be a solution in the end. https://t.co/mZc49Q0Y4r

— SparkPool.eth (@sparkpool_eth) June 10, 2020

Money Laundering or Honest Mistake?

Spark Pool called on the community to provide tips on the mysterious transaction. Though, this wasn’t the first time that Spark Pool has had to deal with a transaction with such an unusually high fee. Historically, Spark Pool has managed to find and split the fee with the original sender each time.

Last year, Spark Pool froze the payout of 2,100 ETH they received for mining a block, worth over $300,000 at the time. It managed to identify a blockchain company based in South Korea as the sender of the transaction, deciding to split the reward with them.

While rare, these kinds of transactions aren’t a new thing in the crypto sphere. According to Cornell professor and founder of AVA Labs Emin Gün Sirer, these “goose egg” transactions do happen occasionally.

There are two possible explanations for these mistakes, he said, with the first being an honest mistake—someone accidentally swapping the amount they wanted to send with the fee they specified. A second explanation could be that miners are laundering money by whitewashing “dirty” coins through transaction fees, turning them into clean tokens.

It’s still unclear whether this was a case of money laundering or a simple mistake.

The post Highest Ethereum Transaction Fee Ever? Someone Accidentally Paid a $2.5 Million Fee appeared first on Crypto Briefing.

Similar to Notcoin - TapSwap on Solana Airdrops In 2024

origin »

Ethereum (ETH) íà Currencies.ru

$ 3069.55 (-0.13%)
Îáúåì 24H $8.165b
Èçìåíåèÿ 24h: -1.38 %, 7d: 4.82 %
Cåãîäíÿ L: $3062.09 - H: $3134.76
Êàïèòàëèçàöèÿ $368.727b Rank 2
Öåíà â ÷àñ íîâîñòè $ 248.87 (1133.39%)

fee million ethereum transaction paid someone ever

fee million → Ðåçóëüòàòîâ: 66


Ôîòî:

Chinese Listed Companies and Bitcoin Mining: Partner or Predator?

This article was originally published by 8btc and written by Lylian Teng. Some Chinese listed companies have jumped on the bandwagon of bitcoin mining following the bitcoin bull run throughout 2017, either under the guise of cloud computing or providing mining hosting services, in an effort to bypass regulations considering the country’s tough stance on bitcoin.

2019-5-29 18:53


Ethereum Creator Suffers Blowback for Proposing New Crypto Wallet Fees

Ethereum creator Vitalik Buterin has proposed a “sustainable” way to fund cryptocurrency wallet development: a tiny per-transaction fee that goes to the wallet’s developers. Ethereum Creator: Crypto Wallets Should Charge Transaction Fees In his view, the fee should be the smallest unit of Ethereum and should be a flat fee, rather than a percentage, so as not to “create a perverse incentive to not optimize gas fees.

2019-3-9 02:00


$30,000 fee for $1 Million Withdrawal? Crypto traders Outraged over Exorbitant fee charges from Bitfinex and Coinbase

From time to time, exchanges undergo several upgrades ranging from new innovative features to system maintenance and withdrawal fee changes. Bitfinex, the world’s 12th largest exchange according to data from coinmarketcap, has updated its payment structure, but users are not in agreement with the new changes made.

2018-11-13 19:09


Destream And Axeso5 To Forever Change Streaming Industry Via Blockchain Lowering Fee Costs

A successful Partnership agreement announced by DeStream and Axeso5 should help in implementation of a decentralized financial ecosystem that will cut down the cost of streaming. This project is supposed to be marketed to large number of active gamers comprising of more than 14 million on Axeso5 platform which is also used by at least […]

2018-11-5 09:15


Notes on Blockchain Governance

In which I argue that “tightly coupled” on-chain voting is overrated, the status quo of “informal governance” as practiced by Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Ethereum, Zcash and similar systems is much less bad than commonly thought, that people who think that the purpose of blockchains is to completely expunge soft mushy human intuitions and feelings in favor of completely algorithmic governance (emphasis on “completely”) are absolutely crazy, and loosely coupled voting as done by Carbonvotes and similar systems is underrated, as well as describe what framework should be used when thinking about blockchain governance in the first place.

2018-7-21 23:03