F2Pool co-founder refuses BIP-444 Bitcoin soft fork, says it’s ’a bad idea’

F2Pool co-founder refuses BIP-444 Bitcoin soft fork, says it’s ’a bad idea’
ôîòî ïîêàçàíî ñ : cointelegraph.com

2025-10-29 14:40

F2Pool co-founder Chun Wang criticized Bitcoin’s BIP-444 soft fork — seeking to curb arbitrary onchain data — as a “bad idea” that he will not support. origin »

Forkcoin (FORK) íà Currencies.ru

$ 0.0168804 (+0.00%)
Îáúåì 24H $0
Èçìåíåèÿ 24h: 0.00 %, 7d: 0.00 %
Cåãîäíÿ L: $0.0168804 - H: $0.0168804
Êàïèòàëèçàöèÿ $87.143k Rank 99999
Äîñòóïíî / Âñåãî 5.162m FORK / 21m FORK

fork bad idea f2pool soft bitcoin bip-444

fork bad → Ðåçóëüòàòîâ: 36


Ôîòî:

Op Ed: Defining Decentralization: How Ambiguity Continues to Divide Crypto

There are many keywords in blockchain, but few spark as much emotion as “decentralization. ” For many of us, it was the dream of decentralization that inspired us to embark into the industry in the first place — the driving force encouraging us to explore the many industries and practice areas that could be positively impacted by this technology.

2019-3-1 19:43


Ôîòî:

Regulators Investigate Last Year’s Record Highs for Bitcoin, Did Tether Prop up the Market?

Bitcoin started the week on a bad note as prices slumped in the BCH hard fork aftermath. According to a new report in Bloomberg, the problems for the coin could just be getting started. The US Justice Department is reportedly looking into the coin’s 1300% rally last year that sent prices to $20,000 and investigating if the […] Regulators Investigate Last Year’s Record Highs for Bitcoin, Did Tether Prop up the Market? was originally found on [blokt] - Blockchain, Bitcoin & Cryptocurrency News.

2018-11-21 16:29


Ôîòî:

Governance, Part 2: Plutocracy Is Still Bad

Coin holder voting, both for governance of technical features, and for more extensive use cases like deciding who runs validator nodes and who receives money from development bounty funds, is unfortunately continuing to be popular, and so it seems worthwhile for me to write another post explaining why I (and Vlad Zamfir and others) do not consider it wise for Ethereum (or really, any base-layer blockchain) to start adopting these kinds of mechanisms in a tightly coupled form in any significant way.

2018-7-21 23:03


Notes on Blockchain Governance

In which I argue that “tightly coupled” on-chain voting is overrated, the status quo of “informal governance” as practiced by Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Ethereum, Zcash and similar systems is much less bad than commonly thought, that people who think that the purpose of blockchains is to completely expunge soft mushy human intuitions and feelings in favor of completely algorithmic governance (emphasis on “completely”) are absolutely crazy, and loosely coupled voting as done by Carbonvotes and similar systems is underrated, as well as describe what framework should be used when thinking about blockchain governance in the first place.

2018-7-21 23:03