Ethereum ‘Catastrophe’ Looms Without Key EIP In Next Hard Fork: Expert

2024-3-6 10:30

In a recent call to the Ethereum community, Ryan Berckmans, a seasoned member, investor, and engineer within the Ethereum ecosystem, has raised an urgent alarm regarding the potential for catastrophic failure within the Ethereum network if the upcoming Pectra hard fork does not incorporate Ethereum Improvement Proposal (EIP) 7251, known as “maxeb.” This proposal seeks to address a critical vulnerability in the network’s ability to handle an increasing number of staked ETH by allowing for greater consolidation of validators.

A Catastrophic Scenario For Ethereum

Berckmans took to X (formerly Twitter) to voice his concerns, stating, “Ethereum’s next hard fork, Pectra, should include EIP-7251 (“maxeb”)…Without maxeb in pectra, Ethereum has no realistic line of defense against the possibility of staked ETH % growing to ~50%+ before a future ~2026 hard fork after pectra.” He underscores the gravity of the situation by pointing out the consequences of inaction, “Well, without maxeb, the worst-case scenario is potentially catastrophic for Ethereum.”

EIP-7251 proposes to increase the maximum effective balance for validators from the current limit of 32 ETH to an unlimited amount. This adjustment is designed to mitigate the risks associated with an overly fragmented validator pool, which could, in turn, compromise the beacon chain’s stability.

The need for such a measure is underscored by Berckmans’ explanation of the technical challenges facing the network: “Base layer experts advise that if staked ETH grows to ~50%+, that will result in severe-to-fatal beacon chain instability. It wasn’t designed for so many validators.”

Berckmans further elaborates on the technical impracticality of modifying the beacon chain within the timeframe of the Pectra hard fork to support a higher percentage of staked ETH, stating, “I’m told that simply fixing the beacon chain to natively support 50%+ staked ETH is totally impossible for pectra. A longer-term solution is still in the research phase.”

Implications Of “Maxeb”

The proposal is not merely a stopgap measure but a strategic enhancement to reduce the number of validators without compromising the network’s decentralized ethos or altering its monetary policy. Berckmans emphasizes, “Happily, EIP-7251 maxeb is more or less ready to go and achieves this goal of reducing the # of validators while not being a monetary policy or issuance change.”

He also dispels concerns that EIP-7251 might disproportionately benefit large staking operators or alter the network’s reward structure: “maxeb does not change issuance or staking rewards…maxeb is not a monetary policy change…maxeb does not help the ‘rich get richer’.”

Moreover, Berckmans highlights the operational benefits that maxeb offers, particularly for staking operators who currently manage multiple validators: “The offchain operational incentive to consolidate comes from (i) maxeb automatically, passively reinvests staking rewards, completely removing the need to make new transactions to stake every 32 ETH of rewards, and (ii) maxeb can reduce devops costs and complexity for staking operators by letting them run one validator instead of dozens or tens of thousands of validators.”

Berckmans concludes with a call to action, emphasizing the critical nature of this decision for Ethereum’s future: “If we don’t include maxeb in pectra, we might be faced with a potentially disastrous situation in which we have to choose between the beacon chain falling over (Ethereum breaks) or making an emergency large change to monetary policy (heavily reducing staking rewards) to shrink the number of validators. Let’s protect Ethereum by including maxeb in Pectra.”

BTC And ETH Community Clash

Despite the technical rationale behind EIP-7251, the proposal has elicited critical reactions from the broader crypto community, particularly among Bitcoin supporters. Checkmatey, Glassnode’s Lead On-chain Analyst, offered a critical view, remarking,

Folks still wonder why ETH is not viewed at the same institutional grade, high resiliency status as BTC. In part, it might have something to do with ‘catastrophic failure’ modes not being accounted for, […] Quite alarming when a proof-of-stake network is designed such that it becomes unstable when **checks notes** too many people stake…?

At press time, ETH traded at $3,770.

Similar to Notcoin - TapSwap on Solana Airdrops In 2024

origin »

Ethereum (ETH) íà Currencies.ru

$ 2920.89 (-0.52%)
Îáúåì 24H $11.569b
Èçìåíåèÿ 24h: -3.29 %, 7d: -5.31 %
Cåãîäíÿ L: $2908.67 - H: $3053.22
Êàïèòàëèçàöèÿ $350.82b Rank 2
Öåíà â ÷àñ íîâîñòè $ 3833.24 (-23.8%)

ethereum hard fork within proposal eip pectra

ethereum hard → Ðåçóëüòàòîâ: 126


Ôîòî:

Bitcoin Trader Pleads Guilty to Securities Fraud, Faces 20 Years in Prison

Joe E. Montroll of Saginaw Texas is facing up to 20 years in prison after admitting to lying to investigators about his role in the theft of Bitcoins deposited by customers of his platform. 2018 has seen a raft of arrests and convictions in the cryptocurrency space as law enforcement, and financial regulators work hard […] The post Bitcoin Trader Pleads Guilty to Securities Fraud, Faces 20 Years in Prison appeared first on Ethereum World News.

2018-7-24 16:27


Ôîòî:

Governance, Part 2: Plutocracy Is Still Bad

Coin holder voting, both for governance of technical features, and for more extensive use cases like deciding who runs validator nodes and who receives money from development bounty funds, is unfortunately continuing to be popular, and so it seems worthwhile for me to write another post explaining why I (and Vlad Zamfir and others) do not consider it wise for Ethereum (or really, any base-layer blockchain) to start adopting these kinds of mechanisms in a tightly coupled form in any significant way.

2018-7-21 23:03


Notes on Blockchain Governance

In which I argue that “tightly coupled” on-chain voting is overrated, the status quo of “informal governance” as practiced by Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Ethereum, Zcash and similar systems is much less bad than commonly thought, that people who think that the purpose of blockchains is to completely expunge soft mushy human intuitions and feelings in favor of completely algorithmic governance (emphasis on “completely”) are absolutely crazy, and loosely coupled voting as done by Carbonvotes and similar systems is underrated, as well as describe what framework should be used when thinking about blockchain governance in the first place.

2018-7-21 23:03


Ôîòî:

Binance Is Finally Going Forward With The VeChain (VEN) Token Swap

Binance has just announced that it will be going forward with the upcoming VeChain [VEN] token swap, which has been in the works for months now. The VeChain Foundation took to Twitter to express its gratitude to the largest exchange in the world for being upfront with its support for the cryptocurrency they worked so hard […] The post Binance Is Finally Going Forward With The VeChain (VEN) Token Swap appeared first on Ethereum World News.

2018-7-19 21:04


EtherScamDB: Ethereum (ETH) Scam Database For Active Threats?

The continued rise of cryptocurrency popularity has created a breeding ground for malicious attacks, phishing attempts, and the occasional PC hacks. While a large popularity of crypto users is earning from their efforts, there is another group that has chosen to earn a living by stealing from the hard workers. What Is EtherScamDB? EtherScamDB was […]

2018-7-15 14:09


Ôîòî:

The Genesis Files: With Bit Gold, Szabo Was Inches Away From Inventing Bitcoin

As his Hungarian parents had fled post-war Soviet regime to settle in the United States, Nick Szabo came to call the Californian Bay area of the 1990s his home. Here, he was among the first to frequent the in-person “Cypherpunk” meetings organized by Timothy May, Eric Hughes and other founding members of the collective of cryptographers, programmers and privacy activists centered around the ’90s mailing list of the same name.

2018-7-13 17:16


Ôîòî:

Jonas Schnelli: Very difficult to make Bitcoin easy for people

Jonas Schnelli speaks about his work as a Bitcoin Core Developer, making Bitcoin more user-friendly, Bitcoin software development as an open source project, dealing with disagreements and criticism, Bitcoin Cash, Ethereum, hard forks, Bitcoin maximalism, time horizons for cryptocurrencies, why the slow progress of Bitcoin can be a good thing, why making Bitcoin more user

2018-6-13 19:55