EIP Implementation Would Have Resulted in Burning Nearly 1M ETH in 2020

2020-10-16 11:12

If implemented, a much-discussed Ethereum Improvement Proposal (EIP) would have resulted in the burning of almost a million Ether (ETH) in 2020, according to data published by Spencer Noon of crypto investment fund DTC Capital, on Oct. 16. It would have also alleviated those massive spikes in gas prices.

The Ethereum Improvement Proposal that could effectively change the fee market mechanism by burning a little ETH for every transaction made has yet to be implemented as it is still being tested.

If EIP 1559 had been implemented, hypothetically it would have burnt an estimated 970,000 ETH over the past 365 days, according to Dune Analytics. At today’s prices, this is approximately $370 million worth of ETH.

If EIP-1559 had been implemented, over the last 365 days, an estimated 970k $ETH ($360M) would have been burnt.

h/t @PhABCD @DuneAnalytics pic.twitter.com/F0ANa0y2Rx

— Spencer Noon (@spencernoon) October 15, 2020

In August, BeInCrypto reported that the highly anticipated Ethereum upgrade was badly needed to tackle surging gas prices, at the time. The proposal would adjust the auction system that is currently in place for bidding on transaction prices. Under heavy load, the bids increase to compete for miner attention which is what causes the gas price spikes.

EIP 1559 would introduce a pricing mechanism that includes a fixed, per-block network fee that is burned and dynamically expands and contracts to deal with congestion. This would also have an effect on Ether supply, eventually reducing issuance over time when proof-of-stake gets underway.

When is EIP 1559?

Developer Tim Beiko has been hard at work on the EIP, but there is still a lot of testing to be done before it can be deployed to mainnet. In his latest update, Beiko stated that there were no new major objections to the proposal.

The update covers a lot of what I've been sharing here over the past few weeks. First up, the EIP-1559 discussion on AllCoreDevs: https://t.co/AqmTNnycIM

— Tim Beiko | timbeiko.eth (@TimBeiko) October 15, 2020

However, he added that the bad news is the denial of service risks on Ethereum is still a major concern that needs to be addressed before deployment.

The 1559 Clique testnet is still running with Basu and Nethermind clients, while Vulcanize is working on a consensus issue. He added that the “biggest win” was getting the specification for the proposal simplified by streamlining transactions.

More Work to Do

A community outreach report was also published last week and one of the key findings was:

“The main benefits that projects see with EIP-1559 are the predictability of gas prices, especially for projects who set them for their users, and the fact that ETH is burnt in each transaction.”

Beiko has also setup a “mainnet readiness checklist,” which shows all of the major things that need to be ticked off before deployment can occur.

In the meantime, Layer 2 is emerging as the go-to solution for faster and cheaper Ethereum transactions.

The post EIP Implementation Would Have Resulted in Burning Nearly 1M ETH in 2020 appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Similar to Notcoin - TapSwap on Solana Airdrops In 2024

origin »

Ethereum (ETH) на Currencies.ru

$ 3117.02 (-0.14%)
Объем 24H $9.263b
Изменеия 24h: 0.69 %, 7d: 6.73 %
Cегодня L: $3114.1 - H: $3125.87
Капитализация $374.423b Rank 2
Цена в час новости $ 367.54 (748.08%)

burning eth eip 2020 resulted spencer oct

burning eth → Результатов: 11


Фото:

Six Addresses Are Dominating Ethereum (ETH) Usage Right Now

Six addresses seem to be the most active ones on Ethereum, burning up above 45% of all gas. All seem related to a single smart contract, awakening the suspicion of Reddit users. Six Wallets Circle Funds with One Smart Contract The common thread between the six most active wallets on the Ethereum network is that they are all communicating with contract “0x01eacc3ae59ee7fbbc191d63e8e1ccfdac11628c”.

2019-9-20 17:00


Фото:

Ethereum Vulnerability Could Have Allowed Attackers to Drain Hot Wallets

A recent vulnerability in the Ethereum network could have reportedly allowed hackers to gain massive profits from cryptocurrency exchanges which haven’t set up a Gas usage limit. A Critical Vulnerability A group of researchers discovered a vulnerability in Ethereum which allowed attackers to drain exchanges by burning their ETH on high transaction costs or to benefit directly by minting GasToken.

2018-11-27 02:00