A $12K-Retest for Bitcoin Likely On-Chain Activity Suggests

2020-8-5 12:26

Bitcoin could hit $12,000 or break above it in the coming sessions as its on-chain activity spikes. According to behavioral analysis platform Santiment, the number of daily active addresses climbed above 1 million on August 3. That, as Santiment noted, validated a scope for a price rally ahead.

Bitcoin closed above $12,000 earlier this week on mounting selling pressure near the level. The cryptocurrency eventually dropped back to $10,500 only to attempt another bounce upwards of $11,000.

As the game of consolidation continues for three days in a row, Santiment believes that the BTC/USD exchange would retest $12,000 or area above the said level in the coming sessions. The behavioral analysis platform concluded by measuring Bitcoin’s flat trend against the rising number of its daily active addresses (DAA).

In retrospect, Active Addresses represent the number of unique addresses that send and buy cryptocurrencies actively.

If they rise, then it points to higher engagement on the cryptocurrency’s network. Coupling it with a bullish market further indicates that most of the transactions taking place across the blockchain are for accumulation.

Bitcoin daily active wallet addresses. Source: Santiment

Santiment predicted a similar outcome for Bitcoin as its DAA touched 1.03 million on August 3.

That marked the third time since July 1, when the number of active addresses spiked over 1 million. Last time it happened before July was in December 2017, the month that witnessed Bitcoin establishing its all-time high at near $20,000.

“With this metric continuing to push higher, it will function as great validation that Bitcoin’s price is justified in retesting the $12,000 range sooner rather than later – and potentially beyond,” tweeted Santiment.

Verifying Bitcoin DAA-Price Correlation

To many, DAA is not an accurate indicator to predict Bitcoin’s future price movements. Anthony Sassano, the co-founder of EthHub, noted in June that the number of active Bitcoin addresses remains artificially inflated because of the cryptocurrency’s UTXO model.

In retrospect, UTXO is a backronym for Unspent Transactions Output. The model prompts users to use new addresses with each transaction.

But traders have primarily ignored these limitations as of late. It was visible in the Bitcoin’s 25 percent price jump after its DAA spiked above 1 million on July 24. Nevertheless, a similar occurrence on July 1 went unnoticed as BTC/USD just spiked by 3 percent in the weeks later.

Bitcoin price spiked by 25 percent following its DAA close above 1 million. Source: TradingView.com

Instead, the Bitcoin network experienced an increase in transactional activity on rising bids for safe-haven assets against the depreciating bond yields and the US dollar. The cryptocurrency was merely reacting to public speculation. It says that Bitcoin would provide a safety net to investors against inflation.

Bitcoin’s traditional rival, gold, also jumped higher on similar sentiments, touching its all-time high above $2,000 per ounce only yesterday.

Macro Support to Continue

A CNBC report published on Wednesday confirmed that the Federal Reserve would maintain its interest rate near zero to keep the US economy afloat through the COVID pandemic. It further confirmed that the central bank would push the inflation rate to its benchmark target of 2 percent.

That, in the long-term, further confirms a rising demand for safe-haven assets. As a result, Bitcoin could hit $12,000 regardless of its DAA readings. Some, including Fundstrat’s Thomas Lee and Galaxy Digital’s Michael Novogratz, even see the cryptocurrency breaking above $20,000, its record high to date.

Similar to Notcoin - TapSwap on Solana Airdrops In 2024

origin »

Bitcoin (BTC) на Currencies.ru

$ 68264.31 (+1.38%)
Объем 24H $33.225b
Изменеия 24h: -2.26 %, 7d: -1.71 %
Cегодня L: $67343.71 - H: $69768.04
Капитализация $1345.124b Rank 1
Цена в час новости $ 11587.89 (489.1%)

above on-chain activity bitcoin platform according santiment

above on-chain → Результатов: 25


User Pays $2.6 Million to Transfer Just $130 Worth of ETH; By Far the Highest Fees Ever Paid

After climbing above $240, the second-largest cryptocurrency has slowed down and is keeping around this level. The percent of Ether supply in profit, which is the percentage of calculating ETH whose price at the last time it moved on-chain was lower than the current price, is currently hovering at 80%. It is the third attempt […]

2020-6-11 17:56


Investor Activity in Bitcoin Is ‘Fizzing Out’ As Market Undergoes A Black Swan Event

Earlier last month, Bitcoin broke above $10,000 that on-chain analyst Willy Woo said was the “real deal”. “Fundamental investment activity is backing this $10k breakout,” said Woo at that time. However, as we saw in the past few weeks, bitcoin has been acting like a risky asset following the stock market, going from above $10,500 […]

2020-3-10 17:14


Фото:

Out of Testnet and Into Alpha: Lightning Labs’ Desktop Application Is Live

Lightning Labs just released an alpha version of its Lightning Network wallet. The desktop application is now compatible with Bitcoin’s mainnet and it leverages Neutrino (the protocol, not the analytics company acquired by Coinbase) to give users a lightweight option to “control their own funds,” as opposed to running a full node or trusting a third party to play custodian.

2019-4-24 01:38


Фото:

Governance, Part 2: Plutocracy Is Still Bad

Coin holder voting, both for governance of technical features, and for more extensive use cases like deciding who runs validator nodes and who receives money from development bounty funds, is unfortunately continuing to be popular, and so it seems worthwhile for me to write another post explaining why I (and Vlad Zamfir and others) do not consider it wise for Ethereum (or really, any base-layer blockchain) to start adopting these kinds of mechanisms in a tightly coupled form in any significant way.

2018-7-21 23:03


Notes on Blockchain Governance

In which I argue that “tightly coupled” on-chain voting is overrated, the status quo of “informal governance” as practiced by Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Ethereum, Zcash and similar systems is much less bad than commonly thought, that people who think that the purpose of blockchains is to completely expunge soft mushy human intuitions and feelings in favor of completely algorithmic governance (emphasis on “completely”) are absolutely crazy, and loosely coupled voting as done by Carbonvotes and similar systems is underrated, as well as describe what framework should be used when thinking about blockchain governance in the first place.

2018-7-21 23:03