India’s Finance Minister Says Government Would Allow Citizens Experiment on Crypto

India’s Finance Minister Says Government Would Allow Citizens Experiment on Crypto
фото показано с : btcmanager.com

2021-3-16 06:30

While uncertainties surround India’s cryptocurrency industry with rumors about an impending ban on crypto ownership, the country’s Finance Minister stated that the government was not going to block all options regarding cryptocurrency.

Similar to Notcoin - Blum - Airdrops In 2024

origin »

Wish Finance (WSH) на Currencies.ru

$ 0 (+0.00%)
Объем 24H $0
Изменеия 24h: 0.00 %, 7d: 0.00 %
Cегодня L: $0 - H: $0
Капитализация $0 Rank 99999
Доступно / Всего 0 WSH

cryptocurrency india crypto government minister finance regarding

Источник: btcmanager.com

cryptocurrency india → Результатов: 126


Фото:

India: Despite the Uncertain Future, One Man Is Spearheading the Fight for Cryptocurrency Regulations

India’s embryonic crypto industry continues to backpedal as on March 29, 2019, the country’s apex court postponed the hearing on cryptocurrency regulations until the second week of July. One Man, 153 Days The reluctant stance from both the government and the judicial bodies has without a shadow of a doubt stunted the growth of theRead MoreRead More.

2019-4-5 01:00


Фото:

India ‘Not in Favor’ of Banning Cryptocurrency (Reports)

The Indian government is reportedly “not in favor” of banning cryptocurrency, new sources claim June 13. Gov’t vs. Central Bank Citing local financial company Cogencis, local news media outlet Economic Times said a dedicated panel studying cryptocurrency “may suggest allowing cryptocurrency,” but with undisclosed “riders” – or provisos – about its usage.

2018-6-13 16:00


дальше еще 77 новостей →

Партнеры Currencies.ru

Аналог Notcoin - Blum - Играй и зарабатывай Монеты



Реклама на Currencies.ru

Самое свежее на Currencies.ru

How the SEC's Recent Win May Play in Its Coinbase, Binance Cases

A federal judge ruled that secondary-market transactions for certain cryptocurrencies violated securities law. The catch: This was a default judgment. The defendant never showed up, and no one filed amicus briefs to oppose the Securities and Exchange Commission's motion for a default ruling.