Ethereum PoS Is Not a Security, Here Is Why

2022-10-7 01:04

The second largest cryptocurrency, Ethereum, may be under the tight scrutiny of the SEC after it shifted to the Proof-of-Stake model. Is ETH PoS security?

The Securities and Exchange Commission is closely examining the cryptocurrency market. They are already fighting a legal battle against Ripple Labs, the company behind XRP. 

The SEC alleges that the Ripple labs sold XRP tokens worth $1.3 Billions between 2013 and 2020 through illegitimate means because XRP wasn’t registered as a security, yet it was offered to investors globally. The curtains could soon fall on the Ripple Labs vs. SEC case, which could set a precedent for future instances in which the crypto’s status as security is being questioned. But before the XRP vs. SEC case can come to a conclusion, there are various speculation if ETH PoS is a security.

Is Ethereum the new target of the SEC?

The SEC Chairman Gary Gensler told reporters from The Wall Street Journal that certain cryptocurrencies that allow staking facilities to their investors might pass the Howey test.

“From the coin’s perspective… that’s another indicia that under the Howey test, the investing public is anticipating profits based on the efforts of others,” Gensler told reporters after a congressional hearing. However, he didn’t name any cryptocurrency specifically.

The Howey test is a crucial criterion used by courts to decide whether an asset should be considered a security under US laws. Investment instruments such as stocks and bonds are classified as securities.

How is the Howey test applied to prove an asset, a security

According to The Securities Act of 1933, an investment contract should have three prongs. A contract should satisfy all three prongs. If an instrument does not meet even any one of the prongs, it cannot be considered security.

An investment of moneyIn a common enterpriseWith reasonable expectations of profits derived solely from the efforts of others

The prong one states, “An investment of money” The validators depositing their ETH in the smart contract to validate the transactions and keep the Ethereum blockchain secure is not necessarily “an investment of money.” They are putting ETH as collateral to participate in the PoS mechanism. They are not making a purchase or an investment.

However, this argument may be valid technically. Still, it cannot be considered a solid argument because the ETH deposited as collateral can be viewed as a “risk” and may fall under the investment criteria. 

Does Ethereum satisfy the second prong?

Under the second prong, “In a common enterprise,” there are two tests of Commonality:

Horizontal Commonality means the individual’s capitals are tied to each other by “pooling of funds.” It is combined by pro-rata distribution of profits.Some believe that staking ETH qualifies horizontal Commonality because the fund is staked in a “common” smart contract, which means “pooling of funds.” It is not pooling because no promoter or central authority has direct control over the staked ETH.The validators stake 32 ETH in a common smart contract, but the staked ETH remains distinct and bound to their node. Validators are incentivized to validate the transactions or slashed if they are involved in some malpractice. There is no impact on all the other validators based on the successful actions or failures of a single validator. Hence there is no pro-rata distribution of profits. Thus the Horizontal Commonality is irrelevant.Vertical Commonality: The vertical Commonality focuses on the relationship between the investor and the issuer/promoter. It is irrelevant in the case of Ethereum because there is no promoter.Ethereum is a decentralized and open-sourced project. Anyone can join the Ethereum network as a validator. They are rewarded or slashed based on their actions through the codes of smart contracts. The rewards they receive are not due to the efforts of any promoters or issuer.

Hence Ethereum fails to satisfy both the test of Commonality. Failure of even one of the prongs proves that Ethereum cannot be considered a security as per the Howey test.

Does Ethereum satisfy the third prong?

The third prong states, “With reasonable expectations of profits derived solely from the efforts of others.” 

The staking reward in Ethereum is determined by the validator’s own efforts, as explained earlier. It does not “solely depend on efforts of others.” The validators are putting efforts into maximizing their up-time and remaining connected to the network.

Ethereum fails to satisfy, if not all, but 2 out of 3 prongs. Hence ETH PoS is not a security.


For Be[In]Crypto’s latest Bitcoin (BTC) analysis, click here

The post Ethereum PoS Is Not a Security, Here Is Why appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Similar to Notcoin - Blum - Airdrops In 2024

origin »

SherLOCK Security (LOCK) íà Currencies.ru

$ 0.1387 (+1.71%)
Îáúåì 24H $13
Èçìåíåèÿ 24h: 10.06 %, 7d: -33.06 %
Cåãîäíÿ L: $0.1387 - H: $0.1387
Êàïèòàëèçàöèÿ $0 Rank 3458
Äîñòóïíî / Âñåãî 0 LOCK / 4.969m LOCK

security ethereum pos model proof-of-stake shifted eth

security ethereum → Ðåçóëüòàòîâ: 126


Ôîòî:

Vitalik Buterin Demands Court Challenge Against New nChain Patent

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has openly criticized Blockchain research company nChain’s latest patent award, calling for opponents to challenge it in court. Pure Invention? nChain, whose chief scientist Craig Wright claims to be Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto while heavily endorsing altcoin Bitcoin Cash, received its latest European patent for what it describes as a “digital security invention.

2018-6-27 06:00


Ôîòî:

Congressman Tom Emmer praised the SEC for clarifying that Ether is not a security

Congressman Tom Emmer has praised the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for clarifying that ethereum’s native cryptocurrency, ether, is not a security. As previously reported, the SEC’s director of Corporation Finance, William Hinman, told the audience at the Yahoo! All Markets Summit: Crypto conference last week that “current offers and sales of ether are

2018-6-23 22:16


Bitcoin [BTC], Litecoin [LTC], Ethereum [ETH], Bitcoin Cash [BCH], Zcash [ZEC] now accepted by Freedom of the Press Foundation

Freedom of Press, on June 18th, tweeted that it will accept donations in five cryptocurrencies – Bitcoin, Litecoin, Ethereum, Bitcoin Cash, and ZCash. It was founded for the purpose of protecting and defending the adversarial journalism and does so through crowdfunding, digital security, and internet advocacy.

2018-6-21 05:02


Ôîòî:

Confirmation Regarding Ripple XRP As A Security, What’s Been Said?

The security debate continues to surround Ripple and Ripple XRP, the native currency to the Ripple network. Very recently, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) have spoken out stating that both Bitcoin and Ethereum do not carry the necessary attributes to be considered a security however, there’s still no official news regarding XRP.

2018-6-18 14:00


Vatalik Buterin denies reports that the NSA created Bitcoin.

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin hit out at mainstream media Friday after an article appeared suggesting he thought the US National Security Agency (NSA) invented Bitcoin. The evidence it gathered came in the form of messages from popular forum Bitcointalk — but Buterin had written them over eight years ago in 2011. “My opinions have obviously changed

2018-6-17 23:30


Ôîòî:

Vitalik Buterin Derides Misleading Reports Regarding the NSA’s Creation of Bitcoin

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin hit out at mainstream media Friday after an article appeared suggesting he thought the US National Security Agency (NSA) invented Bitcoin. ‘My Opinions Have Changed A Lot’ On June 15, UK tabloid publication Metro published what it described as a “discovery” that Buterin had made remarks about Bitcoin’s being created by the US National Security Agency (NSA).

2018-6-16 20:00