Bitcoin’s [BTC] present bull run is significantly different than its last bull run in October 2017, reports Twitter user

2019-4-4 09:30

The cryptocurrency market is often significantly volatile. The ecosystem is always one flash fall or price hike away from growth or bust. The bearish winter took its toll on Bitcoin [BTC], the world’s largest cryptocurrency, and the market witnessed a devastating fall during the price decline of early 2018.

However, the bulls returned to the market as BTC pumped significantly in April. The token recently touched a price valuation of $5000, which the token last crossed on 12 October, 2017.

Kevin Rooke tweeted out the differences between the present bull run and the one witnessed back in 2017.

He tweeted,

Source: Twitter

It can be observed from the chart that the payments per day for the network did not drastically change over time as it was 426,771, 15 months back. It has since gained by 1,094 payments per day,  with the total at 427,865.

However, a major fall in transaction fees was witnessed in the aforementioned time period. The transaction fee per BTC recorded on October 12th was 174$, which is almost 60% more than the current rate. The fee hovered around $62, at press time.

Another major difference was the substantial rise in hash rate. The hash rate back in October was only 7.6 million TH/s. Today, the hashes per second have risen to massive 45.2 million. This suggests that the number of miners in the Bitcoin network have increased, while there is still a profitable interest in mining Bitcoin.

Additionally, the introduction of the Lightning Network is another key difference between the time periods. The Lightning Network played its part in lowering the transaction fee for Bitcoin users on the network.

With the Bitcoin halving scheduled for May 2020, investors in the market are expected to increase from this point forward. The recent bullish wave will only solidify their interest.

The post Bitcoin’s [BTC] present bull run is significantly different than its last bull run in October 2017, reports Twitter user appeared first on AMBCrypto.

Similar to Notcoin - Blum - Airdrops In 2024

origin »

Global Cryptocurrency (GCC) на Currencies.ru

$ 0 (+0.00%)
Объем 24H $0
Изменеия 24h: 0.00 %, 7d: 0.00 %
Cегодня L: $0 - H: $0
Капитализация $0 Rank 99999
Цена в час новости $ 0.0026679 (-100%)

run bitcoin btc significantly market cryptocurrency price

run bitcoin → Результатов: 126


Bitcoiners Organize #RunForHalFinney Memorial Run for Early Bitcoin Developer, Hal Finney, on Sep 6

Five years on from the untimely demise of Hal Finney, a pioneer in Bitcoin development, the community is planning a run in remembrance of him on Friday, 6th September 2019. Bitcoin enthusiasts are urged to join the run through posting pictures of their run on social media using the tag #RunForHalFinney. Hal Finney, Pioneer in […]

2019-9-4 20:36


Фото:

Governance, Part 2: Plutocracy Is Still Bad

Coin holder voting, both for governance of technical features, and for more extensive use cases like deciding who runs validator nodes and who receives money from development bounty funds, is unfortunately continuing to be popular, and so it seems worthwhile for me to write another post explaining why I (and Vlad Zamfir and others) do not consider it wise for Ethereum (or really, any base-layer blockchain) to start adopting these kinds of mechanisms in a tightly coupled form in any significant way.

2018-7-21 23:03


Notes on Blockchain Governance

In which I argue that “tightly coupled” on-chain voting is overrated, the status quo of “informal governance” as practiced by Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Ethereum, Zcash and similar systems is much less bad than commonly thought, that people who think that the purpose of blockchains is to completely expunge soft mushy human intuitions and feelings in favor of completely algorithmic governance (emphasis on “completely”) are absolutely crazy, and loosely coupled voting as done by Carbonvotes and similar systems is underrated, as well as describe what framework should be used when thinking about blockchain governance in the first place.

2018-7-21 23:03